YSL-WTF. (style.com) |
High Fashion (style.com) |
There were
some great jackets and coats. In leather and wool suiting they were great
classic cuts ranging from motorcycle jackets to tailored pinstripe double breasted.
It took me a while to see these clearly however; initially I scanned through
this collection, picked my jaw off the floor, and closed my browser. Mortified.
Going back,
the above mentioned outerwear presented itself more clearly. The clothes that
made up the remainder of the collection however, retriggered the gut wrenching
feeling that resulted from my initial overview.
In relocating
the Saint Laurent atelier from Paris to Los Angeles, much muttering eschewed,
but many no doubt suggested you could take St Laurent out of Paris, but you couldn’t
take Paris out of St Laurent. Today Hedi Slimane proved resolutely that you
could. In a collection that reconfirmed (again) his predilection for urban
youth street culture, Slimane presented a St Laurent collection that channelled
90’s grunge so thoroughly, so derivatively, that there wasn’t
a hint of St
Laurent the man to be seen.
Maybe in certain collared high neck dresses you could
discern the influence of the 1960’s but it was really more about the unkempt, devil-may-care
appearance of rebellious youth that Slimane was so evidently keen to capture. Kinder-whore
baby-doll dresses- check. Oversize cardigans- check. Plaid- check. If Kurt
Cobain had been alive, I’m sure he would have been front row centre.
There is
certainly nothing wrong with these influences- it is of course how (and when)
you use them. The 90’s vibe has been running through fashion for seasons now,
particularly on the high street. Teens and urban hipsters the world over have
been wearing this look for ages and ages. So what did Hedi bring? What was his high
fashion spin on the most popular and visible trend existing in contemporary
youth fashion? Well, there wasn’t one really. Sure the fabrics were undoubtedly
expensive, but they didn’t look it.
I just don’t
see how the St Laurent client is going to feel catered for y this totally
unsophisticated look. Who would want to look like they’re dressed in the
daughter’s wardrobe, AND have to pay through the nose for the privilege? No doubt
the response is the intention to appeal to a younger demographic, but really I don’t
know why. If you do want to put a younger spin on your collection, you have to
do so with a certain sense of control- take Givenchy’s offering, both today and
in previous collections; a great mix of heritage and youth to produce a unique
blend of urban, edgy, sophistication.
As for the
Grunge element. Too literal with no finesse. Done exponentially better by Dries
van Noten last season. Sorry Hedi- I don’t know just how long this stubborn
indulgence can last.
Dries van Noten, Spring 2013. all class. |
No comments:
Post a Comment